Review Article | Open Access

Non-Operative Management of Perforated Peptic Ulcer Disease: Outcomes and Evidence Review

    Moses Adondua Abah

    Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Biosciences, Federal University Wukari, Taraba State, Nigeria

    Onyinye Ifeoma Ikedionwu

    Department of Medicine and Surgery, College of Medicine, University of Lagos, Idi-Araba, Lagos State, Nigeria

    Obagade Ibukunoluwa Oluwatoyin

    Department of Medicine and Surgery, College of Medicine, University of Lagos, Idi-Araba, Lagos State, Nigeria

    Praise Udoka Oputa

    Department of Medicine and Surgery, College of Medicine, University of Lagos, Idi-Araba, Lagos State, Nigeria

    Jemiseye Abayomi Victor

    Department of Medicine and Surgery, College of Medicine, University of Lagos, Idi-Araba, Lagos State, Nigeria

    Ezeudu Paschal Chikelum

    Department of Medicine and Surgery, College of Medicine, University of Lagos, Idi-Araba, Lagos State, Nigeria


Received
23 Aug, 2025
Accepted
06 Oct, 2025
Published
10 Oct, 2025

Perforated Peptic Ulcer Disease (PPUD) is a serious complication traditionally managed surgically. With advances in supportive care, non-operative management (NOM) has emerged as a promising alternative for select patients. This review synthesizes evidence from observational studies, clinical trials, and case reports to evaluate the outcomes, safety, and limitations of NOM in PPUD. Conservative treatment typically involves intravenous antibiotics, proton pump inhibitors, nasogastric decompression, and close clinical monitoring. The NOM is generally suitable for hemodynamically stable patients without generalized peritonitis or sepsis and with localized perforations confirmed by imaging. Reported success rates range from 40-80%, with reduced morbidity, shorter hospitalization, and lower healthcare costs compared to surgery. Imaging, particularly CT scans, is crucial for diagnosis and monitoring. However, risk of failure increases with delayed presentation, large perforations, or malignancy, and mortality is higher when surgery is delayed after failed NOM. These findings underscore the importance of cautious patient selection, multidisciplinary care, and timely surgical conversion when indicated. While surgery remains essential in complicated cases, NOM offers a safe alternative for selected patients. Future randomized controlled trials are needed to establish standardized protocols and improve prognostic tools for patient stratification.

How to Cite this paper?


APA-7 Style
Abah, M.A., Ikedionwu, O.I., Oluwatoyin, O.I., Oputa, P.U., Victor, J.A., Chikelum, E.P. (2025). Non-Operative Management of Perforated Peptic Ulcer Disease: Outcomes and Evidence Review. Trends in Medical Research, 20(1), 64-75. https://doi.org/10.3923/tmr.2025.64.75

ACS Style
Abah, M.A.; Ikedionwu, O.I.; Oluwatoyin, O.I.; Oputa, P.U.; Victor, J.A.; Chikelum, E.P. Non-Operative Management of Perforated Peptic Ulcer Disease: Outcomes and Evidence Review. Trends Med. Res 2025, 20, 64-75. https://doi.org/10.3923/tmr.2025.64.75

AMA Style
Abah MA, Ikedionwu OI, Oluwatoyin OI, Oputa PU, Victor JA, Chikelum EP. Non-Operative Management of Perforated Peptic Ulcer Disease: Outcomes and Evidence Review. Trends in Medical Research. 2025; 20(1): 64-75. https://doi.org/10.3923/tmr.2025.64.75

Chicago/Turabian Style
Abah, Moses, Adondua, Onyinye Ifeoma Ikedionwu, Obagade Ibukunoluwa Oluwatoyin, Praise Udoka Oputa, Jemiseye Abayomi Victor, and Ezeudu Paschal Chikelum. 2025. "Non-Operative Management of Perforated Peptic Ulcer Disease: Outcomes and Evidence Review" Trends in Medical Research 20, no. 1: 64-75. https://doi.org/10.3923/tmr.2025.64.75